01 / The offer

A software licence is not a return guarantee

An Expert Advisor (EA) automates trading rules in a platform. Buyers typically acquire software use rights, not a promised outcome. Identify the developer, licensor, seller, marketplace, broker and support provider. Check the exact domain, legal entity, price, term, updates, refunds and permissions requested. A reputable marketplace does not automatically verify the profitability of every product.

02 / The key evidence

Live result, backtest or demo?

A backtest simulates past markets using assumptions. Tuning a strategy with hindsight can distort results. A demo account may not reproduce live execution, all costs or behavioural constraints. A screenshot or public performance page may show a selected period. Ask for independently reconciled, complete history from a real account, and whether the same strategy version generated every displayed trade.

03 / Review scope

What independent verification should cover

A reviewer should obtain traceable original broker data or direct confirmation, rather than relying only on seller exports. The report should define account holder and type, trades, deposits and withdrawals, fees, spreads, slippage, leverage, maximum drawdown, open positions and strategy changes over a stated period. It should disclose the reviewer’s independence and precise scope. “Verified” or “certified” without criteria is insufficient.

04 / Decision

Three separate checks before purchase

First check the seller and licence. Then examine the marketplace, payment route, complaints, security and broker connections. Finally assess the performance report. Past results cannot guarantee future gains; even a genuine verified history cannot prove the software will behave the same way on your account.

Scope

Claims need evidence

Automated trading combines market risk, leverage, software failure, broker execution and possibly remote-access permissions. The absence of a report calls for caution but does not alone prove fraud. Regulatory permissions depend on the actual service and role.

Related guide →

I‑SCAN ↗

Primary sources and editorial method

Where the checks come from

The CFTC warns about exaggerated trading-bot claims. NFA explains the limitations of hypothetical performance; FINRA emphasises testing and monitoring of algorithmic systems. Our evidence checklist is a due-diligence method inferred from those sources, not an official certification standard.

Back to Pattern Library →