Check before committing
Compare claims with original sources and recognise warning signs before making a payment.
Too many losses begin with claims no one examines in time: a supposed licence, a convincing website, a promise to recover lost funds. We turn those claims into questions that can be checked, before investors decide and when a loss needs to be investigated.
Explore methods, dated warnings and shared mechanisms. Each view leads into the relevant information or tool.
| Year | Dated entries |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 |
| 2006 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 4 |
| 2011 | 19 |
| 2012 | 30 |
| 2013 | 43 |
| 2014 | 124 |
| 2015 | 230 |
| 2016 | 151 |
| 2017 | 190 |
| 2018 | 234 |
| 2019 | 1368 |
| 2020 | 431 |
| 2021 | 732 |
| 2022 | 540 |
| 2023 | 578 |
| 2024 | 602 |
| 2025 | 7860 |
| 2026* | 6202 |
We examine the claims behind investment offers, websites and purported recovery services. The public toolkit helps you verify a provider, recognise a method, preserve evidence and choose a sensible next step.
A polished website, a familiar name or a claimed register entry can create a sense of safety. The useful question is whether the legal entity, authorisation, domain, contact route and payment destination actually fit together.
We help investors examine those connections early. When a loss has already occurred, a careful reconstruction matters more than a quick promise. This is especially true of services claiming they can recover lost funds.
Compare claims with original sources and recognise warning signs before making a payment.
Who offered what, through which website, under which name, and using which payment route?
Preserve records, limit further harm and sharpen the questions for a qualified review.
An official warning matters. The absence of a search result is not reassurance. We keep each statement tied to its source and put the pieces into a traceable account.
A brand, legal entity, domain and person making contact may all be different. Start by establishing their relationship.
Registers and official notices sit alongside agreements, messages and technical clues. Each source supports a different kind of conclusion.
The useful next step changes before payment, after suspicious contact and after a loss.
A case may involve both the firm's permissions and conduct, and the technical origins of a website, message or account access.
We examine the firm's identity, the service offered and its documented conduct. For regulated firms, onboarding, contractual terms and the practical implementation of requirements may also warrant review. Qualified legal specialists handle individual legal questions.
Digital traces can reveal connections that a name search misses. Specialist expertise supports technical investigations and cybersecurity work.
Explore Proteo Defence ↗Public tools provide orientation, not a verdict on a company or an individual case. For financial providers, begin with I‑SCAN and check the original register or notice. For deeper research, follow the relevant route through the toolkit.
Browse all toolkit modules →Identify the contracting entity, compare its authorisation with the activity being offered, inspect the domain and payment instructions, then document what remains unresolved.
Open I‑SCAN overview →For substantial losses or complex business conduct, an individual review may make sense. Its scope, sources and questions are agreed separately. Legal assessments and specialist IT or cyber forensic work involve appropriately qualified experts.
Explore professional services and methods →
A confidential whistleblower channel is planned. Until its safeguards are in place, this website does not accept sensitive reports. For matters within German financial supervision, the BaFin whistleblower office ↗ offers an official route.
Independently verify anyone who approaches you after a loss promising recovery and asking for fees, credentials or remote access. Examine a recovery claim in the pre-check →
If none of the behaviours described in the Fraud & Scam Pattern Library matches what you observed, use our form to suggest the pattern for editorial review and possible inclusion in the database.
Suggest a new pattern →